/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11922891

259KiB, 724x483, GettyImages-1219888397.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Tue 21 Jul 15:46:23 2020 No.11922891 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11924120 >>11924161

if man made global warming was real, why amount of increase of CO2 concentration in the atmosphere not reduce in 2020?

In 2020, World carbon emission reduce by about 25% due to coronavirus

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 21 Jul 2020 21:49:17 No.11924120 Report

Quoted By:

>>11922891
if jesus was the son of god and had to die to save us, why did he resurrect afterwards? are we not saved after all? why the ruse?

if lockdowns are for 'flattening the curve', why do they keep them where health care systems have no risk of collapse? or maintain them well after recovery?

you do not question central tenets of religions

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 21 Jul 2020 22:08:15 No.11924161 Report

Quoted By: >>11924272 >>11924275

>>11922891
If my bathtub fills up from the faucet, why is it that when I reduce the amount of water coming out of the tap by 25% my bathtub doesn't empty?
please help this is a serious question, my water bill is getting very high and water spilling over the edge has already started leaking through the floor into the apartment below i can not afford to pay for any more repairs

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 21 Jul 2020 23:10:26 No.11924272 Report

Quoted By:

>>11924161
The solution is obviously to offshore your bathtub faucet to your sloppier upstairs neighbor and pay water trading commissions to an international banking exchange.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 21 Jul 2020 23:11:20 No.11924275 Report

Quoted By: >>11924376 >>11924396

>>11924161
only 4% of your water faucet can be attributed to people, it's still over flowing in your stupid analogy.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-CO2-l (...).png, 83KiB, 751x463

Anonymous Tue 21 Jul 2020 23:47:32 No.11924376 Report

Quoted By: >>11924396

>>11924275
It would be nice to see the 4% citation, preferably in a published paper.

The major issues is humans have overwhelmed the natural cycle of carbon dioxide processing. We don't naturally have the highest concentration of carbon dioxide in human history from any normal event.

It would be nice to know, if humans aren't the cause, why this event only started around the time we started industrializing and has only gotten worse as we increased our carbon output. Any explanation?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 21 Jul 2020 23:53:16 No.11924396 Report

Quoted By:

>>11924275
>>11924376
He's talking about how large the natural carbon cycle is compared to our emissions, but he doesn't understand that when you add up all of the natural sources and sinks you get a number close to 0, whereas there are no sinks for our emissions. Probably because he's a useful idiot or just retarded.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO CC_global carbon cycle.png, 7KiB, 400x222

Anonymous Wed 22 Jul 2020 01:37:38 No.11924674 Report

Quoted By:

439-450= -11
332-338= -6
29-17= +12
Humans are the only contributing factor.

Around 450ppm/+2C the two 800 lbs gorillas turn from sinks to emitters.

https://skepticalscience.com/argument.php
#34

https://skepticalscience.com/human-co2-smaller-than-natural-emissions-intermediate.htm

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches