>>11919777All money that is easily divisible and distributable is good money.
However, money is not really the problem. It's the institutions in which it inhabits that is the problem.
Sadly, these institutions are not able to be made "rational", because rational would mean good for some, worse for others. Moreover, as people are very different in terms of financial intelligence, decisions regarding such, do also differ greatly. When you combine this bias of distribution alongside a high correlation between wealth and power, you also create a system where centralized money can only exist "fairly" when there's only one centralization. But as no one wants to give up their land and culture to unite, it leaves us with two choices:
A money that is centralized by a rational single entity (AI for instance)
Or a completely decentralized money, where darwinistic features will prevail.
You cannot have money be in the hands of entities that derive utility from it, if you do not want darwinism to dictate the distribution.
