>>11920103you were arguing that it was natural singularities would exist since they exist in equations, that is entirely fallacious reasoning
strange how you immediately ditched defending that statement and then accuse me and the original anon of strawmanning you while then listing off strawmen of us
>What's next in your repertoire of brilliant retorts? Conciousness begets reality? We don't know if we are a brain in a jar?you have no argument besides "i saw it on paper once"
>>11920117because equations are imperfect models
GR already contradicts QM, why the fuck would you trust it this much you retard
established just means "the best we have so far" its not infallible