>>11913149Stupid starting point
I see, so you have empirical proof of space then? Perhaps time? Post please, I'm curious.
>posts about what the big bang doesn't say but nothing about what it actually saysAt least you aren't lying, you just didn't say anything of use.
>FalseExplain how magnets work
>FalseOh no that happens, all the time actually. One must wonder how you can measure the speed of something with a different quality of itself.
>Schizo babble.>he doesn't even understand what electrostatic induction isOf course you don't, that's why people like you redescribe the same phenomena over and over and call it something new with each re-description. In this case they call it "the doppler effect", which is explained using other nonsensical, non\-explained descriptions such as "Space" and "Gravity". Yet they fail to realize that a moving bodies causes induction in the dielectric object that is "planet/moving matter".
