Please discount all social science posts, not only do they usually come from low quality threads but they come from a low quality field
>Using standard social science methodology, it is possible to prove that listening to particular songs causally makes you younger
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0956797611417632
>P-hacking is endemic
http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/unpublished/p_hacking.pdf
>Even relatively more rigorous subjects aren't immune
https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
If you have an opinion you consider ""informed"" based on reading the abstract of a paper or two, please consider revisiting it.
>Using standard social science methodology, it is possible to prove that listening to particular songs causally makes you younger
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0956797611417632
>P-hacking is endemic
http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/unpublished/p_hacking.pdf
>Even relatively more rigorous subjects aren't immune
https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
If you have an opinion you consider ""informed"" based on reading the abstract of a paper or two, please consider revisiting it.
