>>11905135>What is your take on this?Nanotechnology is a field in which specialization is necessary as it is a field that can include many things. What interests me most, is its application as wet nanomachines.
>>11905209>1. Do you know any cool upcoming medical uses of nanotechnology?https://robotics.sciencemag.org/content/4/30/eaav4317.abstracthttps://www.nature.co m/articles/s41565-0 19- 0619-3
https://www.nature. com/articles/s41 563-02 0-0685-9
>2. What is your opinion on this being used for nefarious purposes such as invasive/invisible surveillance, assassination, etc? Will there be defenses for this type of thing?We are far, far away from dry nanomachines that could organize themselves into such complex systems. The only defense against such injections would be your own nanomachines. But you only have to worry about that stuff in 60 years or so.
