>>11904020>So in other words we need something to fully replace the Shuttle's repair and return capability, and its original promised cadence/cost levels... without the one in three crew loss rate. I don't think that'll be Starship since the cargo variant's fairing opens the wrong way. You really do need the Shuttle type clamshell design for that.Really not what I mean, that's too specific and not using efficient infrastructure. Even within LEO
Using directly a shuttle type would waste a lot of fuel because of the extra mass and I do hope you are not even implying manned mission again.
A proper infrastructure is to have unmanned ship meant strictly for orbital works waiting in low orbit to retrieve the package, refuel then accomplish the job using more sophisticated remote.
Aside as an human being I have to point out your comment about birth control is not ethical.
>>11904026>would violate the NAPI should now better than to argue with crazy but what kind of insane troll logic make you think that?
Mankind should have better goal than becoming organic Paperclip Maximizer, and I'm not imagining the chaos if someone invent immortality and we start having people asking for the eradication of neighbor they dislike.
