>>11907102werkin on it
If you push it a little further, you'll get some pretty interesting outcomes.
Assuming (by continuing counter clockwise past infinity):
you'll find that to reach -1, it's actually .
Thus, it may really be .
But in this case, would be an alternate solution to along with i and -i.
Alternatively, if it's simply , this nicely gives an explanation for how cosh(x) can smoothly transition to -cosh(x) as x increases past infinity
>this is just the normal cosh(x). But if you continue past infinity, you get
