/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11891252

112KiB, 886x903, 45389FB5-061E-418E-9D8B-A3F7C94D7BD2.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

I ADMIT DEFEAT

Anonymous Sat 11 Jul 22:12:23 2020 No.11891252 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11891264 >>11891273 >>11891274 >>11891289 >>11891332 >>11891354 >>11891373 >>11891415 >>11891435 >>11892060 >>11894872

I’m stuck anons. Seems like a 74 years old failed vodka salesman and WWE hall of famer managed to solve this and yet, I’m stuck.

H-HELP?!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jul 2020 22:15:27 No.11891256 Report

Quoted By: >>11891262

A = ?2, B=?3, C=?4

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jul 2020 22:18:16 No.11891262 Report

Quoted By:

>>11891256
> ?2
> natural number
I don’t think that’s the answer anon

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jul 2020 22:19:11 No.11891264 Report

Quoted By: >>11891274

>>11891252
Thankfully Fermat already solved this for me.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO file.png, 2MiB, 1400x787

Anonymous Sat 11 Jul 2020 22:23:15 No.11891273 Report

Quoted By: >>11891275

>>11891252
its literally unsolvable thats the joke... look up fermats last theorem.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jul 2020 22:24:17 No.11891274 Report

Quoted By:

>>11891252
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_triple#Generating_a_triple
Proving that those three can't be squares simultaneously is left as an exercise to the reader.
>>11891264
Thanks, Fermat.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jul 2020 22:25:04 No.11891275 Report

Quoted By: >>11891281 >>11891288 >>11892194

>>11891273
Wile's proof was for the cubic version. Fermat originally proved for all >3

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jul 2020 22:28:10 No.11891281 Report

Quoted By:

>>11891275
No, no, that's Mochizuki's abc proof.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jul 2020 22:30:26 No.11891288 Report

Quoted By:

>>11891275
me too, but I lost my proof oopsie :). I guess thats how we prove things now eh?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jul 2020 22:30:27 No.11891289 Report

Quoted By:

>>11891252
Convert the question to French where 'positive' means non-negative and let a = b = c = 0.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jul 2020 22:54:52 No.11891332 Report

Quoted By: >>11891333 >>11891335 >>11891337 >>11891358 >>11891546

>>11891252
A equals 1
B equals 1
C equals 1

Ez

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jul 2020 22:55:57 No.11891333 Report

Quoted By:

>>11891332
2 = 1

Good job

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jul 2020 22:56:57 No.11891335 Report

Quoted By:

>>11891332
>2=1

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jul 2020 22:57:02 No.11891337 Report

Quoted By:

>>11891332
Based retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jul 2020 23:10:21 No.11891354 Report

Quoted By:

>>11891252
>wow m gunna trukl guz who odnt now bout ferma thirem

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jul 2020 23:10:45 No.11891358 Report

Quoted By:

>>11891332
Retardedly based

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jul 2020 23:16:14 No.11891373 Report

Quoted By:

>>11891252
>natural positive number
Wet water is wet.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1566110890447.jpg, 381KiB, 1846x1212

Anonymous Sat 11 Jul 2020 23:19:01 No.11891376 Report

Quoted By: >>11891383 >>11892121

The problem says a and b are natural numbers, not c. Fermat does not apply here.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jul 2020 23:24:27 No.11891383 Report

Quoted By:

>>11891376
lol epic troll lol sci in a nutchell high iq board

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO ..32.jpg, 5KiB, 233x216

Anonymous Sat 11 Jul 2020 23:33:44 No.11891415 Report

Quoted By: >>11892065

a = 1
b = 2
c = ?

1 + 16 = 17

--> c = 17^(1/4)

ez
>>11891252

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jul 2020 23:45:55 No.11891435 Report

Quoted By:

>>11891252
>where a, b and are natural positive numbers
a = 1, b = 1, c = 2^(1/4)

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Jul 2020 00:57:55 No.11891546 Report

Quoted By:

>>11891332

Not going for

A=0
B=0
C=0

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Jul 2020 06:16:36 No.11892060 Report

Quoted By: >>11892070

>>11891252
0,0,0, idiot
(0 is a positive number, because it's not negative)

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Jul 2020 06:18:42 No.11892065 Report

Quoted By: >>11892121

>>11891415
i didn't do the math myself, so i'll take your word for it that $17^{1/4}$ is a natural number

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Jul 2020 06:20:24 No.11892070 Report

Quoted By: >>11892074 >>11892105

>>11892060
>0 is a positive number, because it's not negative
Actually, 0 is negative, because it's not a positive number.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Jul 2020 06:24:17 No.11892074 Report

Quoted By:

>>11892070
oh fuck

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Jul 2020 06:45:19 No.11892105 Report

Quoted By:

>>11892070
Actually your 0 is positive only if you took a 1 in it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Jul 2020 06:54:39 No.11892121 Report

Quoted By: >>11892122

>>11892065
Learn to read, it doesn't have to be a natural number.
See >>11891376
Oh goddammit /sci/, your reading comprehension is at abysmal levels.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO file.png, 19KiB, 377x61

Anonymous Sun 12 Jul 2020 06:55:24 No.11892122 Report

Quoted By: >>11892160

>>11892121

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Jul 2020 07:16:56 No.11892160 Report

Quoted By: >>11892486

>>11892122
>where a and b are natural positive numbers
>no mention of c
Yeah, thanks for proving me right?
Are you senile or just generally retarded?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1583102411264.jpg, 11KiB, 218x231

Anonymous Sun 12 Jul 2020 07:31:09 No.11892194 Report

Quoted By:

>>11891275
Funny post. Thanks anon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Jul 2020 08:17:06 No.11892261 Report

Quoted By:

Only a and b have to be positive natural numbers. c can be anything. That means any natural positive values of a and b solve the problem.

sage goes in all fields

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO the absolute state of sci.png, 417KiB, 1846x867

sage goes in all fields Sun 12 Jul 2020 08:33:23 No.11892284 Report

Quoted By: >>11892369 >>11892371 >>11892375

itt

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Jul 2020 09:29:16 No.11892369 Report

Quoted By:

>>11892284
>sage
>posting pic
>newfag

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Jul 2020 09:30:34 No.11892371 Report

Quoted By:

>>11892284
god i wish i went all in chainlink

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Jul 2020 09:34:11 No.11892375 Report

Quoted By:

>>11892284
you have to touch me retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Jul 2020 10:44:49 No.11892486 Report

Quoted By: >>11892574 >>11892582

>>11892160
> a, b and = a and b
do you have dyslexia?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Jul 2020 11:36:39 No.11892574 Report

Quoted By:

>>11892486
No, but I automatically correct subhuman spelling in my head.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Jul 2020 11:39:25 No.11892582 Report

Quoted By: >>11894770

>>11892486
It's reverse polish notation obviously, I adjusted it for brainlets to comprehend.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Jul 2020 22:40:15 No.11894770 Report

Quoted By:

>>11892582
kek, good find

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Jul 2020 23:14:57 No.11894872 Report

Quoted By:

>>11891252
a = b = c = 1

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches