This thread probably has been made several times, I know how 4chan is and I know what /pol/ is like, but what's the consensus here on Richard Lynn and his work on race and IQ?
Jared Taylor references his work all the time and is not really the type to reference unreliable sources. That said, there's extensive criticisms of his work. Just on wikipedia alone, on all his major works, the criticism write up large, sometimes larger than the rest of the article. When googling him you're basically just met with criticisms and negative commentary on his work. Is his stuff that questionable and shit, or is it ideologically driven?
His work on psychopathy and dysgenics doesn't seem to get the level of seethe that his race stuff does, which makes me wonder if the criticism is ideologically driven.
But yeah, I'm about to pick up a copy of all his race and IQ works, just wondering /sci/'s perspective.
Jared Taylor references his work all the time and is not really the type to reference unreliable sources. That said, there's extensive criticisms of his work. Just on wikipedia alone, on all his major works, the criticism write up large, sometimes larger than the rest of the article. When googling him you're basically just met with criticisms and negative commentary on his work. Is his stuff that questionable and shit, or is it ideologically driven?
His work on psychopathy and dysgenics doesn't seem to get the level of seethe that his race stuff does, which makes me wonder if the criticism is ideologically driven.
But yeah, I'm about to pick up a copy of all his race and IQ works, just wondering /sci/'s perspective.
