>>11874945Honestly speaking? Both fields are fine, and if you look at the papers in Nature and even the pay-to-public Nature communications, psychology and sociology papers are great.
It's that certain subfields of the study that aren't held to much rigor (ie, social psych and lack of reproducibility, cognition and statistical learning, etc.) give it a bad rep, alongside the fact that many undecided undergrads use it as a filler major because their undergrad programs aren't as intense as good research would ask for.
