>>11871732But my analysis is quite integrated at this point and corresponds consistently to experience, even before I had read about MBTI or Planetary Correspondence. How is it possible that the things I noticed about myself were represented very plainly within the Star Chart? For example, for me Saturn is in Aquarius, Saturn is the challenge provider, Aquarius looks for independence in thought, and I had a rough go in life early on because I was using the judgments and idioms of others to know Truth. This is probably a common folly of the Libra, since the Libra is socially adept and likes to pick the brains of others. Knowing that my Saturn was in Aquarius makes those early challenges even more apparent, and I now know when going about life that to take the judgments of others as factual is folly. The challenge in my life was the challenge to think and exist independently of the influence of others, and holding to that has netted me personal and mental stability in spades.
Maybe MBTI tells you where your strengths lie initially, and the star chart illustrates how to improve. MBTI is the starting character sheet, and Zodiacal information is the class/stat growth section.
MBTI doesn't really give you information that can be used to grow, though as an INTP i would meet INTJs whose organization always struck me as useful, so I have been reading into INTJs, trying to emulate their J using my P.
I aim to make it possible to emulate all of the functions that don't come naturally to me.
I want to stradle the lines between every type, becoming a chameleon in the process.
In the end, i should be able to integrate the high points of every type, while doing away with all of their weaknesses. This should make me impossible to categorize, since once successful, I will have morphed the Ego the INTP tends to lack and I had to learn to build from the ground up, into a swiss army knife. I become the type that is best suited for dealing with any scenario I might come across.
