The "black hole" has zero foundation in theory whatsoever.
!RTObpJ46zw No.11865679 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>11865755 >>11865762 >>11865788 >>11867454
Neither Newton's theory nor Einstein's predict it. In fact, both theories preclude it, contrary to what the relativists claim.
The so-called "Schwarzschild" solution isn't due to Schwarzschild at all. The black holers have apparently not read Schwarzschild's 1916 memoir.
Schwarzschild's paper: https://z.zz.ht/4icTU.pdf
The so-called "Schwarzschild" solution is from David Hilbert - itself a corruption of a solution first derived by Johannes Droste in May 1916, whose paper has also been "forgotten" - it appears the black holers haven't read Hilbert either.
Hilbert's erroneous derivation: https://z.zz.ht/Mmj1i.pdf
Hilbert's mistake spawned the "black hole" and the theoretical physicists today continue to elaborate on this falsehood while angrily shouting down any voice which challenges them. Schwarzschild's solution has no "black hole" and neither does Droste's solution.
While you're at it, read Marcel Brillouin's 1923 paper, in English, in which he demonstrates the black black concept is nonsense: https://z.zz.ht/v28gp.pdf
The black holers are often quick to brand people questioning "black holes" as crackpots etc. Unfortunately for them, doing so doesn't magically alter reality. The black holers must also label Schwarzschild a crackpot as his paper invalidates the "black hole" outright, as does Brillouin's, and Droste's. They must also label Einstein a crackpot as Einstein always rejected the "black hole" idea, asserting in his papers and writings it's not physical and that singularities in his gravitational field nullify the theory of General Relativity.
"Black hole" "experts" -- like Hawking and Ellis, Misner, Thorne and Wheeler, S. Chandrasekhar -- often claim the Michell-Laplace dark body is a "black hole" and that they can be components of binary systems and that "black holes" can collide and merge. Those claims are patently false. See G. C. McVittie's conclusive arguments which invalidate those ridiculous claims, here: https://z.zz.ht/BZlZF.pdf
The so-called "Schwarzschild" solution isn't due to Schwarzschild at all. The black holers have apparently not read Schwarzschild's 1916 memoir.
Schwarzschild's paper: https://z.zz.ht/4icTU.pdf
The so-called "Schwarzschild" solution is from David Hilbert - itself a corruption of a solution first derived by Johannes Droste in May 1916, whose paper has also been "forgotten" - it appears the black holers haven't read Hilbert either.
Hilbert's erroneous derivation: https://z.zz.ht/Mmj1i.pdf
Hilbert's mistake spawned the "black hole" and the theoretical physicists today continue to elaborate on this falsehood while angrily shouting down any voice which challenges them. Schwarzschild's solution has no "black hole" and neither does Droste's solution.
While you're at it, read Marcel Brillouin's 1923 paper, in English, in which he demonstrates the black black concept is nonsense: https://z.zz.ht/v28gp.pdf
The black holers are often quick to brand people questioning "black holes" as crackpots etc. Unfortunately for them, doing so doesn't magically alter reality. The black holers must also label Schwarzschild a crackpot as his paper invalidates the "black hole" outright, as does Brillouin's, and Droste's. They must also label Einstein a crackpot as Einstein always rejected the "black hole" idea, asserting in his papers and writings it's not physical and that singularities in his gravitational field nullify the theory of General Relativity.
"Black hole" "experts" -- like Hawking and Ellis, Misner, Thorne and Wheeler, S. Chandrasekhar -- often claim the Michell-Laplace dark body is a "black hole" and that they can be components of binary systems and that "black holes" can collide and merge. Those claims are patently false. See G. C. McVittie's conclusive arguments which invalidate those ridiculous claims, here: https://z.zz.ht/BZlZF.pdf
