>>11865512yes
>>11865543No it was more like, a TV educated kind of spelling. And sometimes it appears as if the creator tried to guess what the words mean based on 2 doku he saw using this words 3 times. Grammatical it was correct, and the words could be used in this kind of questions.
But the conclusions the test assumed to be correct, where beyond wired, and showed a lag of understanding of the language. Sometimes so far reached that only a kid could have drawn this conclusion if it has to guess the word.
So i dont think it was translated at all.
Maybe a math freak to silly 4 language created the test. This test would have been beyond easy if the creator would have used the correct words.
Im not only writer but i also searched multiple dictionary if i could find a second third, fourth or fifth meaning. Occasionally he hit one of this meanings who arent really in common use, but most times he didn't even do that.
The conclusions would have worked, if you would count the very twisted use of the words as correct.
If you count for example missuses words in Hollywood films as correct interpretation of the word, it would have worked occasionally.
There where also questions of oversimplified, biological classifications. Where the correct answer could only show up, if you know that the creator use this kind of oversimplification in the first place.
It was as if a kid created this (based on the knowledge of documentations) with out ever making the effort to look something up.
