/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11857395

169KiB, 570x965, computational-physics.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Computational Physics

Anonymous Wed 01 Jul 18:08:39 2020 No.11857395 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11857947 >>11858132 >>11859703 >>11860704 >>11862837

Computational Physicists or Computational Chemists here?

Why can't we use the standard model for anything useful?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 01 Jul 2020 20:50:11 No.11857947 Report

Quoted By: >>11858132 >>11858156 >>11859479

>>11857395
Ball and spring is based. Hell, I do coarse-grained work where each ball is 4 heavy atoms and any associated hydrogens. Lets me simulate big 'ol systems at large timescales.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 01 Jul 2020 22:13:31 No.11858132 Report

Quoted By: >>11858136

>>11857395
>>11857947
my balls don't have springs :(

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 01 Jul 2020 22:14:55 No.11858136 Report

Quoted By: >>11858148

>>11858132
How are they attached to you?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 01 Jul 2020 22:18:17 No.11858148 Report

Quoted By: >>11862825

>>11858136
van der waals forces

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 01 Jul 2020 22:20:16 No.11858156 Report

Quoted By:

>>11857947
like youud odo actua;ly fphsyical simulatuationnof realrealy?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 02 Jul 2020 07:56:48 No.11859479 Report

Quoted By:

>>11857947
have you ever done p3m stuff or do you still do particle-particle only??

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 02 Jul 2020 10:25:31 No.11859703 Report

Quoted By:

>>11857395
I just passed the exam on this. Fuck this.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 02 Jul 2020 17:43:56 No.11860704 Report

Quoted By:

>>11857395

What percentage of physical prototyping is currently replaced by industry-standard CAD/M?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 03 Jul 2020 08:36:12 No.11862825 Report

Quoted By:

>>11858148
kek

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 03 Jul 2020 08:45:35 No.11862837 Report

Quoted By:

>>11857395
This is literally the only time this meme has been right. Also comp-chem's, I see you shitting up my Phys. Chem. journals with an endless stream of "QCD of obscure MOF shows STRANGE PEAK in high vacuum" and an abstract of why it will revolutionize batteries.

Question: does any experimentalist ever follow up on these papers, leading to material advantages? Or is it just a huge grift so you can play with your nifty modelling toys and fancy density plots?

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches