/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11855990

167KiB, 1101x412, Screen Shot 2020-06-30 at 11.04.47 PM.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Wed 01 Jul 06:05:20 2020 No.11855990 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11856043 >>11857334 >>11857887

It is though.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 01 Jul 2020 06:12:30 No.11856001 Report

Quoted By:

Nah, I think it is a string.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 01 Jul 2020 06:29:13 No.11856043 Report

Quoted By: >>11857316

>>11855990
That's giving it more credit than it deserves. "Quantum Gravity" has less credibility than crystal healing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 01 Jul 2020 17:46:13 No.11857316 Report

Quoted By:

>>11856043
Yup. Bunch of uptight scientists laughing at people calling it what it is.. a construct.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 01 Jul 2020 17:51:38 No.11857334 Report

Quoted By:

>>11855990
>at the time paper had no peer review
As if peer review changes anything.
This peer bull crap started 20 years ago,editors were always the ones who decided what they were publishing and often time it was biased as fuck.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 01 Jul 2020 17:52:50 No.11857337 Report

Quoted By:

>At that time the journal did not practice academic peer review

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 01 Jul 2020 20:23:47 No.11857887 Report

Quoted By:

>>11855990
>make fun of x for not doing real science
>claim that a single experiment over a single journal over a single article somehow demonstrates anything

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches