>>11846525Seems as though anon is talking about undergrad, not grad CS. That being said
>a mathematician or physicist trained in reading definitions, theorems, and proofs can pick up all of a BSc CS's theoretical CS in much more depth in a single afternoon after reading a book1) why are we comparing undergrad material to a PhD's understanding
2) this isn't exactly the case even if we go out to the research field at large, looking at the collabs between CS, math, and physics researchers.