/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11841713

92KiB, 1095x1080, 1593239897541.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 06:49:47 2020 No.11841713 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11841717 >>11841719 >>11841768 >>11841860 >>11841870 >>11842079 >>11842459 >>11843085 >>11844125

Why this happens?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 06:50:59 No.11841717 Report

Quoted By: >>11841718 >>11841722 >>11841744 >>11842177

>>11841713
>Why does a /pol/ thread invariably find its way to /sci/?
I really don't know, man

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 06:53:10 No.11841718 Report

Quoted By: >>11841728 >>11841808 >>11841817 >>11841825 >>11844125

>>11841717

The point is that isn't the so-called illustrations how dinosaurs etc. looked as much fantasy as the bible? It has little to none to do with reality, yet people believe in muh T-Rex because of Jurassic Park, while in reality the creature probably did look nothing like it

Evolutionists are less grounded in reality than some religious people

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 06:53:20 No.11841719 Report

Quoted By: >>11841725

>>11841713
Step 2 is false. Bones can actually tell you how much weight was placed on them and even show you the mass was distributed. Additionally dinosaur footprints tells us how much weight the animal had while it was alive.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 06:55:19 No.11841722 Report

Quoted By: >>11841727 >>11841733

>>11841717
>/pol/ thread
RENT FREE

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 06:58:29 No.11841725 Report

Quoted By:

>>11841719
Fantasy.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 06:58:37 No.11841727 Report

Quoted By: >>11841733

>>11841722
>>>/pol/265090329

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 06:59:16 No.11841728 Report

Quoted By:

>>11841718
What does this even have to do with evolution? Maybe some dinosaurs did have a big fat head with soft tissues that haven't been observed in fossils. That doesn't mean that anything about evolution has been disproven, it just means we've been drawing them wrong. And believe me, we already know we had some details wrong about them drawings in the past. We used to draw them with bald scaly skin, but now we know that's not true for many of them.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 07:02:25 No.11841733 Report

Quoted By:

>>11841722
>>11841727
holy shit btfo

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 5AD5A1B3-5BC0-4CA0-B68B-4B962D1C (...).jpg, 16KiB, 400x267

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 07:08:00 No.11841744 Report

Quoted By: >>11841749

>>11841717

https://darrennaish.files.wordpress.com/2019/01/kosemen-2017-updated-edition-of-book-all-your-yesterdays.pdf

I’ll stop you there buster.

This is most certainly /sci/.

Paleo animal depictions are influenced by a history of wrong ideas & media which hungers for action figure monster mashes and not mere mortal animals.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 07:09:33 No.11841749 Report

Quoted By:

>>11841744
This stopped being a /sci/ thread as soon as the word "evolutionism" was invoked

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 07:20:35 No.11841768 Report

Quoted By: >>11844125

>>11841713
The second picture is inaccurate. That's not how they'd end up, because the power front teeth are unstable that way.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 07:47:23 No.11841808 Report

Quoted By:

>>11841718
>evolutionists
yeah, my sky daddy told me that he made everything

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO ACF61024-CAF6-49EE-A739-D883C439 (...).jpg, 76KiB, 720x405

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 07:49:38 No.11841813 Report

Quoted By:

Seems pretty obvious what they looked like to me

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 07:56:02 No.11841817 Report

Quoted By:

>>11841718
Your point is idiotic. Show some evidence first that reconstructions are completely wrong.

Sure there might be guesswork at play but so what? That doesn't mean that a hippo skull would suddenly be depicted as some reptile. That's just stupid.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 08:00:15 No.11841825 Report

Quoted By:

>>11841718
Is that the narrative you've built up in your head? Basing an entire scientific endeavor off of a 90s Hollywood blockbuster?
You need to try a little harder, man. Just a little more effort is all I ask.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO anatomy_hippo_624.jpg, 128KiB, 468x624

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 08:19:27 No.11841860 Report

Quoted By:

>>11841713
People got their idea of cute hippos from zoo animals with cut off teeth. It's a dangerous beast otherwise. The hippo at the bottom had its teeth removed.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO hippo-skull-white-28878693.jpg, 58KiB, 800x533

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 08:25:13 No.11841870 Report

Quoted By: >>11842075 >>11842222

>>11841713
That skull is cherrypicked. Look at this one in a closed position.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 10:35:58 No.11842075 Report

Quoted By:

>>11841870
Of course it's cherry picked, it's a creationist thread

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 10:40:06 No.11842079 Report

Quoted By:

>>11841713
>obvious huge mounting point for jaw muscles
>no it should be a weird bone thing sticking out of the cheek hahah
woah

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 11:03:08 No.11842098 Report

Quoted By:

ignore OPs bible shilling and redraw dinosaurs as cute reptiles based on there skellytons

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 11:48:22 No.11842177 Report

Quoted By:

>>11841717
You don't know because you're not a real scientist, retard.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 12:11:15 No.11842222 Report

Quoted By:

>>11841870
re-reading your post, and this thread (w/out sounding schizo, bear w/ me) may have passed off a triggering false narrative, w/ a catchy title and picture.
I'm gonna take another look when the cup of coffee I had this morning wears off. Could be wrong.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Estemmenosuchus.jpg, 52KiB, 440x414

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 14:04:50 No.11842459 Report

Quoted By:

>>11841713

Are you implying pic related essentially was a prehistoric hippo?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 18:26:14 No.11843085 Report

Quoted By:

>>11841713
It doesn't.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 18:33:52 No.11843121 Report

Quoted By:

Do you think scientists can't distunguish mammals and reptiles skulls and sceletons? Or do you think it's unreasonable to assume that pre-historic reptiles mostly had similar traits and skin structure to the modern reptiles?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 23:56:51 No.11844125 Report

Quoted By:

>>11841768
>>11841713
>>11841718
>huuurrrrr
intentionally obvious cherrypick. artist rendering/reconstructions are always shit,

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches