/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11840991

105KiB, 1393x876, Fake mathematician vs Real mathematician.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 00:00:39 2020 No.11840991 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11841001 >>11841063 >>11841334 >>11842061 >>11842233 >>11842651

Does any self respecting mathematician still say QED?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 00:03:17 No.11841001 Report

Quoted By: >>11841032 >>11841334 >>11842265

>>11840991
\begin{proof}\end{proof} adds the box automatically. So no, only schizos who write their "papers" in Microsoft Word use QED.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 00:15:23 No.11841032 Report

Quoted By:

>>11841001
QED.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 00:29:05 No.11841063 Report

Quoted By:

>>11840991
No one cares

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 03:05:07 No.11841334 Report

Quoted By:

>>11840991
When I write on paper I use a tall rectangle with diagonal lines inside. On PC I use LaTeX like >>11841001. Only undergrad virgins say QED

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 10:02:00 No.11842036 Report

Quoted By:

>the wizard QED
>the virgin box
>the chad //

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 10:18:50 No.11842061 Report

Quoted By: >>11842097 >>11842544

>>11840991
>implying a meek wordlessly autistic box is chad whereas giant bold QED letters aren't

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 10:23:55 No.11842063 Report

Quoted By:

BOX AND FLOWERS

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 10:31:10 No.11842070 Report

Quoted By:

>... and we are done.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 11:02:58 No.11842097 Report

Quoted By:

>>11842061
QED has more pop-math appeal but the box is what real mathematicians use.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 11:04:37 No.11842103 Report

Quoted By:

either a square or three dots and "true" or the result holds
occasionally throw in a WWWWW

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 11:04:58 No.11842105 Report

Quoted By: >>11842109 >>11842150 >>11842151 >>11842228

whats qed mean

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 11:07:26 No.11842109 Report

Quoted By: >>11842135 >>11842147 >>11842158

>>11842105
short for queued
it means the proof is done and the next action has been queued up

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 11:24:35 No.11842135 Report

Quoted By:

>>11842109
kek

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 11:32:49 No.11842147 Report

Quoted By:

>>11842109
thanks

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 11:36:05 No.11842150 Report

Quoted By:

>>11842105
quod erat demonstrandum
"that which was to be proved"

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 11:36:30 No.11842151 Report

Quoted By: >>11842210

>>11842105
quantum electro-dynamics.
every proof it an aspect of QED, so it's just a reminder when it's proven, that it can link back to QED.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 11:39:29 No.11842158 Report

Quoted By:

>>11842109
Nice

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 11:50:25 No.11842184 Report

Quoted By:

I’m a box boi myself.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 12:03:35 No.11842210 Report

Quoted By:

>>11842151
OP here, I lol’ed

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 12:14:45 No.11842228 Report

Quoted By:

>>11842105

(Q)ringe and blu(E)pille(D)

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 12:16:53 No.11842233 Report

Quoted By:

>>11840991
I write QED before even reading the question. Thats how based I am.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 12:30:34 No.11842265 Report

Quoted By:

the box is for textbooks so a student can tick it once he understands the proof. QED is for true professionals. also big lmao @ latexbabbies like >>11841001 too low IQ for plain tex and defining your own proof macros?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 14:27:22 No.11842544 Report

Quoted By:

>>11842061
based

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 14:29:10 No.11842548 Report

Quoted By: >>11842561 >>11842562

What's Chad is nothing. The reader is expected to understand the proof is over

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 14:32:48 No.11842561 Report

Quoted By:

>>11842548
>Yikes! This textbook sucks! There are proofs inside of theorems inside of proofs inside of proofs!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 14:32:53 No.11842562 Report

Quoted By:

>>11842548
pilled

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 13482834688462.jpg, 22KiB, 490x326

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 14:34:02 No.11842565 Report

Quoted By:

>three paragraphs of text
>we have proved the following:
>Theorem 3.2

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 15:04:58 No.11842651 Report

Quoted By:

>>11840991
I like to put a little pizazz on mine by writing:
>And just like that, we have won
>Another amazing math fact proof all done!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 15:15:08 No.11842680 Report

Quoted By:

$1+1=2$
I respect myself.
>QED

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches