/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11838766

58KiB, 960x720, THEINNERPLANETS.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 09:46:42 2020 No.11838766 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11838769 >>11838800 >>11838821 >>11838840 >>11838993 >>11839175 >>11839205 >>11839238 >>11839450 >>11840340 >>11840472 >>11841028 >>11841096 >>11841110 >>11841401 >>11841424 >>11843515

Ok so call me a deranged lunatic, but why couldn't we just build a pipe going into the CO2 layer of Venus and then have it go to Mars on the other end and transfer a bunch of CO2 from Venus to Mars, like syphoning petrol out of a car?

168.19

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 09:48:59 No.11838769 Report

Quoted By: >>11838792

>>11838766
Siphons have a limited height in which they can work, it wouldn't work for air that is higher than the limit of the atmosphere, or between two atmospheres, regardless of if anything like that coulod be physically built. (It almost certainly couldn't)

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1593164802986.jpg, 60KiB, 960x720

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 10:10:17 No.11838792 Report

Quoted By: >>11838803

>>11838769
Instead of siphoning, could we just put a pump, or multiple pumps, on the pipe?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 10:18:47 No.11838799 Report

Quoted By:

I think I find this so intriguing because Benus would be -42C without its atmos, so by removing the right amount we could get it to the right temperature, and by adding the right amount to Mars, we could get Mars to the right temperature. If there was any more CO2 left after getting Mars nice and warm, we could build yet more pipes to Ceres and the moons of Jupiter.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 10:20:11 No.11838800 Report

Quoted By: >>11838835 >>11841842

>>11838766
Assuming it were feasible to transfer gases from one planet to another (which it isn't) it would be much easier to just transfer the extra CO2 being emitted on Earth to Mars.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 10:22:17 No.11838803 Report

Quoted By: >>11838835

>>11838792
Ahh of course. It would be so easy to create a pump long mllions of kms to connect 2 planets and create an engine that could tpump gas from one end to the other.

You definetly have to be a low IQ nigger

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 10:33:43 No.11838821 Report

Quoted By: >>11838835 >>11838949

>>11838766
you're a deranged lunatic. So venus and mars orbit at different radii. Venus orbits faster because it's closer and Mars orbits slower because it's farther. Such a pipe would break. There's also the fact that if it didn't it'd have to pass through the sun and the fact that such a pipe would be FUCKING HUGE. It takes ENORMOUS amounts of energy to move mass between planets. I forget the exact number, but somewhere in Earth orbit, a mass of gasoline has more kinetic energy than chemical energy. It TAKE HUGE AMOUNTS OF ENERGY TO MOVE STUFF BETWEEN PLANETS! And then there's the fact that you'd be moving OCEANS worth of CO2. I mean maybe you could do some crazy shit like do a bunch of gravitational sling shots and ships scoop up venus' atmosphere take it to mars for the cost of changing Mars and Venus' orbits a bit. Still it's fucking ridiculous.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 10:39:04 No.11838835 Report

Quoted By: >>11838857

>>11838803
Wow rude
It's only 74 million miles from Venus to Mars. Way back in 1955 there were already 20 million miles of telephone wire in the United States alone.
I'm pretty sure a few measly pumps and some segments of pipe are doable.

>>11838800
Now you're thinking with pipes.
Also why would that not be feasible?

>>11838821
You can build a flexible pipe. You could also build a pipe that could detach if an obstacle was going to be coming up and then reattach after.

>a mass of gasoline has more kinetic energy than chemical energy.
That doesn't sound at all believable to me since it's possible to drive a car full of gasoline up a hill.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 10:40:06 No.11838838 Report

Quoted By:

The virgin terraform
The Chad pipe

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 10:41:05 No.11838840 Report

Quoted By: >>11838854 >>11838857

>>11838766
It'd be easier to nuke mars.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 10:47:21 No.11838854 Report

Quoted By: >>11838857 >>11838919

>>11838840
That does sound pretty based.
I'm guessing it would be cheaper too.
Papa Musk pls nuke Mars (after taking appropriate samples)

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 10:49:56 No.11838857 Report

Quoted By: >>11838912

>>11838835
Orbit isn't about height it's about speed. Gasoline has a chemical energy density of around 46.4 MJ/kg which translates to a speed of 9633 m/s. So probably at an orbit height a bit more than low earth orbit. This table here also gives you an idea of the energy required. We can also express the 'cost' of getting to a desired orbit in terms of the change in speed from one orbit to another, and surface to LEO is about this much.
>>11838854
>>11838840
won't work. You can't liberate enough gas to make an atmosphere that won't require a pressure suit:
https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/goddard/2018/mars-terraforming/

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 11:21:12 No.11838912 Report

Quoted By: >>11838932

>>11838857
can we build a blackhole inside mars' core to increase the gravity so we can have a regular atmosphere?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 11:23:38 No.11838919 Report

Quoted By:

>>11838854
Anon, you have to go back.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 11:30:08 No.11838932 Report

Quoted By: >>11838956

>>11838912
No. And that's not the problem here. Mars can maintain a transient atmosphere for thousands of years if you can mobilize atmosphere fast enough. Even if you have losses due to solar wind. The problem here is that there's not enough easily extractable CO2 to make an atmosphere. There is harder to extract CO2, but mobilizing it requires large scale strip mining of the martian surface. An excavation and rock processing operation on the scale of continents is just not something that's possible any time soon. Because building all the equipment requires much more resources than humanity as a whole has. Although self-replicating machines might be our best bet at attempting such operation.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 11:35:52 No.11838939 Report

Quoted By: >>11838956

May I remind you that NASA is trying to launch the James Webb telescope for over a decade now.

Just as a perspective for your pipe dreams.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 11:39:55 No.11838949 Report

Quoted By:

>>11838821
So only connect the pipe if both planets are on the same side respective to the sun. It's not rocket science.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 0iN84zuy_400x400.jpg, 18KiB, 400x400

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 11:42:45 No.11838956 Report

Quoted By: >>11838970

>>11838939
>NASA

>>11838932
Wouldn't the poles be enough?
And if not, are you saying we need the pipe?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 11:48:44 No.11838970 Report

Quoted By: >>11839005 >>11839183

>>11838956
the poles don't provide enough CO2. Vaporizing them would provide 0.6% of an earth like atmosphere:
https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/goddard/2018/mars-terraforming/
The pipe is still straight up retarded. It's gonna require materials much stronger than what currently exist. It's gonna be HUGE. You have everything you need to make an atmosphere in the dirt on Mars, it just takes more effort than our economy can currently support. Unless of course you can make self replicating machines.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO ukzu.jpg, 87KiB, 953x715

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 11:51:54 No.11838982 Report

Quoted By: >>11839005

yes

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 11:54:31 No.11838993 Report

Quoted By: >>11839015

>>11838766
How long would the pipe be? Engineering aside, assume any length is possible, give me a value for the length

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1593172314316.jpg, 95KiB, 953x715

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 11:58:36 No.11839005 Report

Quoted By:

>>11838982
I just put that in to note that it was flexible.

>>11838970
>The pipe is still straight up retarded.
So it's the only hope we've got and we need a team of mavericks who are willing to go off the book?
Why would it need to be strong? You just make it longer than the maximum distance so it never snaps taught, and maybe have little bitty holes on the side that can open to release CO2 from inside the pipe to steer it. I'm not some literal who just sitting here in my living room eating rice and trying to throw ideas at the wall.
What I mean is, have little holes along the whole length of the thing to steer.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 11:59:54 No.11839011 Report

Quoted By: >>11839019

Use the CO2 to make giant balls of dry ice in orbit around Venus, then push them on a trajectory to collide with mars.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 12:01:21 No.11839015 Report

Quoted By:

>>11838993
The average distance is 119,740,000km, so I'd say 239,480,000km.
We could also make a smaller, more cuqq like pipe that could deliver the gas when the planets were close.
But the dream would be about 250 million glorious kms of pipe

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 12:02:32 No.11839019 Report

Quoted By: >>11839163

>>11839011
Me likey.
Does CO2 actually work like that?
I'm definitely in favour of this idea, I just don't want to pursue pie in the sky ideas over reasonable alternatives like the pipe.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 12:02:46 No.11839020 Report

Quoted By: >>11839035 >>11839191

Genetic engineering of microorganisms will do the job. Not only can they can be used to terraform Mars, but furthermore also to marsiform Earth.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 12:10:16 No.11839035 Report

Quoted By: >>11841395

>>11839020
The job for whomst? Mars, sure. But does Venus get some love?
How do we solve the Venus question?
Make a billion balloons with high albedo and put them on the atmosphere??

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 95005813.jpg, 471KiB, 1327x1143

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 12:43:06 No.11839124 Report

Quoted By:

is it time?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1571622449224.jpg, 37KiB, 451x492

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 12:57:11 No.11839163 Report

Quoted By:

>>11839019
>reasonable alternatives like the pipe
>reasonable

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 13:02:30 No.11839175 Report

Quoted By:

>>11838766
>call me a deranged lunatic
nah, that's too sophisticated for you
you are just a clueless retarded

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 13:05:15 No.11839183 Report

Quoted By:

>>11838970
> The pipe is still straight up retarded.
I don't think this actually has to be said anon, it's pretty clear cut.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 13:08:29 No.11839191 Report

Quoted By: >>11840178

>>11839020
won't work. There are not significant quantities of liquid water on Mars for said microbes to live in.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 13:15:08 No.11839205 Report

Quoted By: >>11839491

>>11838766
I get that everybody is shitposting here, but you would actually get a flow of liquid from the lightest gravity well to the lowest. That is exactly what siphoning does. The only problem is that the planets have relative velocities and rotations to each other, which probably fucks over the system. But figuring out how a the fluid mechanics of a siphon work between moving and rotating unequal spheres is an entirely nontrivial problem and none of you nerds have any idea of what would happen. If you figured the equations out you'd probably be able to publish it in PRE

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1460404131573.jpg, 301KiB, 1179x824

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 13:26:27 No.11839238 Report

Quoted By:

>>11838766
It's better to freeze CO2 and transport it as dry ice.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 14:44:09 No.11839450 Report

Quoted By:

>>11838766
better idea would be to place somr high power fans on venus to blow co2 in the direction of mars

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 14:53:55 No.11839480 Report

Quoted By:

I'd be easier to move one planet to the other then do this.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 14:57:30 No.11839491 Report

Quoted By: >>11839764

>>11839205
>but you would actually get a flow of liquid from the lightest gravity well to the lowest. That is exactly what siphoning does.
Only if it remains a liquid which it wouldn't, it would vaporize at the pressure drops.
So no, it wouldn't work, in any way, in any hypothetical scenario. At all.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 16:16:45 No.11839764 Report

Quoted By:

>>11839491
It would work with ionic liquids as they have no vapor pressure.
>undergrads btfo

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 17:24:00 No.11839972 Report

Quoted By: >>11840996

Okay retard OP.

Google 'space elevator'. Learn why it is a great idea and why we can't build one (no known material strong enough to reach into space without breaking under its own weight) . And that's just an elevator into earth's orbit.

Now apply what you have learnt to your dumbass idea.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 17:37:26 No.11840013 Report

Quoted By: >>11840049

Once when I was a kid, I had the idea for a device to breathe underwater. So my dad took me to target and Home Depot, and I assembled a device that was a floating boogie board (pool float thing) with a 2L bottle to take in air through a hole in the middle attached to a hose, and a snorkel at the end of the hose.

We managed to get it watertight and you could breathe on land or at the surface, but even at the bottom of the pool, you couldn’t take in enough air through the thing to breathe. The pressure underwater was too much; I learned that for real underwater diving, you need a machine to compress the air.

This would suffer from the same flaw, even though there’s the pressure and concentration differential from Venus to Mars, it’s not anywhere near enough for the gases to flow through the vacuum of space in a flexible tube. You’d need a rigid pipe, which brings all its own set of configurational problems, as well as a pump station on Venus

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 17:47:55 No.11840049 Report

Quoted By:

>>11840013
Kid you had ambition and drive-how did you end up here?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 18:20:28 No.11840178 Report

Quoted By: >>11840199

>>11839191
unless you put an artificial magnetosphere on or in front of the planet to prevent solar wind losses, you could be looking at small lakes within 5 years after activating the field

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 18:24:45 No.11840199 Report

Quoted By:

>>11840178
btw can someone do the math for me in terms of propulsion required to prevent the magnetosphere from barreling into mars with tremendous force? as i understand it you would have to do something to counteract the energy of the solar wind

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 19:11:45 No.11840340 Report

Quoted By: >>11840466

>>11838766
how long would it take, according to your above average intelligence, to connect some 30 million miles of pipe between two planets? think real hard
>inb4 we already did it on earth, what's the problem

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 20:12:25 No.11840466 Report

Quoted By: >>11840996

>>11840340
say with current tech, but unlimited resources; could probably be done, right?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO spheres-n-pipes.jpg, 30KiB, 600x512

Anonymous Fri 26 Jun 2020 20:15:42 No.11840472 Report

Quoted By: >>11841022

>>11838766
like this but instead of fake its real and with pipes

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 00:01:16 No.11840996 Report

Quoted By: >>11841017

>>11840466

kys

or read this
>>11839972

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 00:09:19 No.11841017 Report

Quoted By:

>>11840996
my corpse won't help with the construction of an interplanetary gas transmission pipeline, anon. We're looking for realistic solutions, here.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 00:11:36 No.11841022 Report

Quoted By:

>>11840472
it's easy cause the ones hanging down will be in tension. the main problem would be if you pulled the planets to the bottom of space, they won't float back up

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 00:13:54 No.11841028 Report

Quoted By:

>>11838766
>passes through busy shipping lane
Wouldn't be safe

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 00:52:24 No.11841096 Report

Quoted By:

>>11838766
Build a giant mirror that reflects sunlight in order to blast large chunks of the venusian atmosphere off.
Direct the blown off atmosphere so that it gets to Mars.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 01:01:21 No.11841110 Report

Quoted By: >>11841399

>>11838766
I think it would be a lot easier to reverse the greenhouse effect on venus, there's enough gravity to hold on to the oxygen you generate, just takes a decent amount of fission reactors to split the co2 but seems doable. No need to transport anything or blow anything up

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 01:20:54 No.11841133 Report

Quoted By:

instead of engineering mars to be like earth, why not engineer earth organisms to flourish on mars

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 01:31:48 No.11841164 Report

Quoted By:

>venus has a high pressure atmosphere
>mars has low pressure
It might work

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 03:41:39 No.11841387 Report

Quoted By:

>This thread
My sides, thanks, I needed a good laugh.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 03:47:29 No.11841395 Report

Quoted By: >>11841406

>>11839035
Transferring some of Venus's atmosphere to Mars would make Venus easier to terraform. Someone less lazy than me would need to do the calculations to see if we could get them both to around 1 ATM.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 03:51:47 No.11841399 Report

Quoted By: >>11841413 >>11842226

>>11841110
What would you do with all of the excess carbon?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 03:52:48 No.11841401 Report

Quoted By:

>>11838766
I mean, sure a pump would work. It's a bit impractical but yeah it would work.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 03:54:23 No.11841406 Report

Quoted By:

>>11841395
I mean, you would still have a planet with an atmosphere composed of 50+% CO2, and when know how a little CO2 can make hell on earth...

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 03:59:22 No.11841413 Report

Quoted By:

>>11841399
Burn it to sell cheap energy, of course.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 04:05:43 No.11841424 Report

Quoted By: >>11842262 >>11843467

>>11838766
nigga do you know how far away the moon is?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Nazi-Base-on-Mars.jpg, 109KiB, 650x463

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 08:11:18 No.11841842 Report

Quoted By:

>>11838800
Its feasible but you need a railgun and solid CO2 (dry ice).

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 12:14:39 No.11842226 Report

Quoted By:

>>11841399
compress and make diamonds for extra $$$

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 12:27:23 No.11842260 Report

Quoted By: >>11843204 >>11843414

Mars has no magnetic field, so even if we transported CO2 into Mars it would be blown away by solar wind

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 12:27:53 No.11842262 Report

Quoted By:

>>11841424
Are you saying we should build a pipe to the moon to give it CO2 if we have too much on earth?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 19:01:19 No.11843204 Report

Quoted By:

>>11842260
We could transfer more than what gets blown away right? Everyone could drive around in the dirtiest 20 cylinder RWD behemoths and then the big straw could send our hoon juice to Mars.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 19:53:23 No.11843414 Report

Quoted By:

>>11842260
Could we magnetize mars? Use solar power for electromagnets?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 20:05:41 No.11843467 Report

Quoted By:

>>11841424
What if we push it closer?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Jun 2020 20:16:50 No.11843515 Report

Quoted By:

>>11838766
Just freeze blocks of solid co2 and pack them into cans that you can shoot at mars with a railgun. We can do it from the outer solar system too if we build fusion, or mega engineer solar arrays.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches