Seems like /sci/ is made up of three distinct groups;

1. Trained scientists
2. Students
3. Fanbois

Fanbois are embarrassingly bad at digesting scientific journals, and typically share articles from journalists. They post about race, iq, and climate change; always with certainty.

Students are not much better at digesting scientific journals, but markedly more certain. They post about which subject is superior and why you're a shill for disagreeing with what they learned sophomore year.

Then there are trained scientists. We try explaining to both groups that certainty decreases with experience.

Hypothesis, the size of groups 2+3 >> 1