Why is modern academia so biased in their skepticism?

No.11834749 ViewReplyOriginalReport
It seems modern academia pulls at strings for some things, and drags their feet for others.

Take dark matter for instance. Not only have we found no proof of it, we are building theories on top of theories around it. We never stop to think whether dark matter is a byproduct of an inaccurate and incorrect understanding of physics.

On the other side, you have phenomena like the USS Nimitz encounters. In a week long span, pilots, super hornet FLIR pod cams, the USS Nimitz radar, the USS Princeton radar, and a spy hawk all detected cylindrical objects going up to mach 51+ within less than a second. However, whenever these are mentioned, instead of looking at this phenomena with wonder and curiosity, it only brings out irrational skepticism.

>how dare you question my UFO

The most common takes that skeptics say is that the blobs on the footage are jet exhaust, or that it’s some kind of optical illusion. Or that it’s all a glitch and that the pilots are crayon eaters. If they were truly skeptical and utilized occams razor, these theories would be out the door, and their main retort would be that the whole thing is a hoax, as it is way more likely