>>11828824>>11828838physics without calculus is like eating a burger without any meat. I suggest you build a strong mathematical basis from which you can then go on to learn basic physics. First I suggest you read calculus by spivak and if youre truly braindead watch 3b1b's videos on calc as a supplement. If spivak is too hard or abstract, I like many others, regrettably, learned calculus from stewart. When you are advanced in calculus or want to step your game up, read shlomo sternberg's advanced calculus (yes ik funny name but great book). This will be enough to learn basic classical mechanics for which I highly recommend
>>11828967 (the advanced version of this). Its the best book for classical mech ive ever found and I will surely buy a hardcover when I get older and have some shekels. Other than that, you will also have to learn introductory electromagnetism. I dont remember the text I learned from but just look up any introductory bullshit (until you learn ODE's the subject is usually just electrostatics and whatnot, and the equations look so much like classical mechanics). Once youve done all of this, your next step is to learn differential equations (I recommend v. arnold or maybe boyce and deprima). Learning this will allow you to learn fourier analysis, an introduction to waves and oscillations, and also harmonic oscillations in classical mechanics. From there you need linear algebra for quantum and yadayadayada.
tldr; If you dont like math, youre pretty much not gonna make it.
also if you dont already know who feynman or dirac are, do yourself a favour and look them up. feynam's lectures on physics (volume 1) covers pretty much everything you need to know for introductory physics and his explanations are top notch. Also I just remembered soviet books are pretty good, most notably iridov's mechanics
>>11829003dogshit book in my opinion
