>>11825600>Again, why is it so important that the sentence MUST say "proved" instead of "gave a proof"?It's not. There's no particular reason it has to be phrased the way it is. You could rework it into many other forms that would be technically acceptable.
But there's no technical reason to do so, since the article is currently "stable", rule-wise. Nothing needs to be fixed, there's no content missing, and making those changes would add no substance to the page.
You don't give a shit about some little formatting tweak that moved a link two inches down, you just saw a screenshot that a feminist moved it and you see a chance to start some epic libtard drama.
Of course you're right that minor rules are irregularly enforced; I admitted as much in the first post I made. But that's not a reason to seethe when they do get enforced or act like they're somehow not real rules because some instances get missed.
