>>11820783Hard to. I realized awhile ago that if morphic field theory is correct, then the way Sheldrake talks about the concept has, itself, a morphic field. In other words, I could upset the morphic equilibrium he's trying to build by shifting the conversation too far in a strange direction.
You kind of have to figure it out yourself for this to mean anything. Remember that it's not telepathy for two people to have the same idea.
