>>11819841>some of the expected detailsactually, a lot of the expected details. "If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck."
being a contrarian about whether the "higgs boson" is the higgs boson is a huge stretch given the wealth of results that we have now.
>Higgs boson might or might not be a composite particle, it does not matter.it does matter though. but it is irrelevant to this discussion. but currently the evidence points to absolute agreement with the theory, which states that it is fundamental and not composite
