>>11821647Are you stupid mate the issue is not how taxes could solve it, they have been already implemented and the underlying issues are still there, growing. How have they helped? I ask you, how will MORE taxes help to fix this? The population and industries are still growing and emissions are still going up due that
They were supposedly going to help by discouraging both the general population and industries from wildly polluting and as an incentive to supersede fossil fuel based technologies towards cleaner energies.
>How can research in the funding stage go against a consensus? That wouldt. never published anything
>And how is that relevant to us? Are we dinosaurs? You said we are in an interglacial as if that somehow implies we are not in an ice age.Earth has have more time without icecaps that with them, that's what I was referring to with "geological reference". Mankind doesn't matter in a geological scale, if you haven't noticed.
>The Vostok ice core shows temperature rising andSo you haven't seen the Milankovitch cycle graphs superposed with temperatures, CO2, methane and other related stuff, right
>What do you mean?>We're already in a mass extinction. Now please explain who says the>Almost nothing has actually been done. Clap yourself on the back. Saying X hasn't The current world will gonna end and nothing has been done. No technologies towards fixing the main issue, no halting or reduction of emissions, no new technologies to replace the old polluting ones, no plans that I know of to deal with the hundreds of millions of people that WILL move from coasts and ravaged lands.
You're really fucking stupid mate. You're defending a posture that has all the evidence they want to take actions, any actions, and the only thing they do is ask for more taxes because ???
