>>11810574I assume you got these from the first R/ddit thread that popped up when you searched for some of these genes.
>you're only looking at educational attainment>we don't actually know what those genes do. To claim they increase intelligence is a lieThese two statements are paradoxical, to claim that we don't know what these genes do, then claim also that these genes only have something to do with possible educational attainment. You can argue one or the other, but not both.
>data only comes from a sample of European menThe entire project is small, with only 2504 people being examined. Considering, though, what we can observe comparing the economically controlled SAT/IQ scores between Europeans and Africans, the state of African civilizations throughout history and currently, crime differences between Africans and all other peoples, etc., it's not far off to predict that this selection of evidence indicates a much larger disparity between white and black genomes.
