>>11805600He has literally no basis to be revered as much as he is in popsci circles.
Just look at his wiki list. The dumb man would exclaim "wow, his list contributions is MASSIVE! He must be smart". The clever man reads into each listing and notes a trend; Von Numale was the Steve Jobs of the STEM world- he took other people's ideas and remarketed them as something "groundbreaking" and "totally novel".
He's listed as the "father of computer viruses". Why? He wrote a paper in which he said out you could copy memory (in this case program data) from one region to another. Nothing new. Nothing groundbreaking- something that had already existed (because it's so obvious and useful) and he marketed it as novel or exciting. Now he is known as THE FATHER OF COMPUTER VIRUSES!!!
Game theory, Von Neumann architecture, cellular automation and many, many others, are all examples of this FRAUD stealing others' work and presenting as something new.
---
Plus if you go watch his interviews on Youtube, it is clear that he talks like a total retard, and not someone that has the equivalent computing power of ten thousand autists juiced up on as many amphetamines as possible.
If you thing Von Numale is smart, you are a popsci faggot and deserve a very painful death, preferably by cannon.