>>11803856>Intuitionism is true, empiricallyNo. Intuitionism is just a autistic form of faggoty logical positivism applied to math for faggoty retards like Brauwer who are faggots.
The statement "every even number greater than 2 is the sum of 2 primes" is either true or false. Whether there exists/does not exist an even number that is not the sum of two primes doesn't depend on a proof. Either there is one floating out there, or there isn't. IT doesn't magically start to exist because we have a construction of it - the construction is simply a map to the number, it doesn't MAKE the number it just points to it. The number was already there. This applies to all mathematical structures/objects.
Intuitionism is just faggoty positivism for people without imagination or the ability to take risks. "This statement isn't proven yet so that means that it floats in a magical state of indeterminancy!! The statement then magically becomes true only when a set of symbols that humans write down shows it's true!" No, dumbfuck. The statement is objectively true or false regardless of whether humans have, or even can, ever figure it out.
Positivism is the worst and most disgusting epistemology ever constructed. "I don't know the answer so I am not even going to talk about it at all!" Literally extreme autism and lack of true intelligence and imagination.
Throw constructivism in the trash.
