>>11795389It means that 'Wealth' is a market-position.
It's like one of these false-narrative thread titles, to call 'Wealth' an achievement or success metric. Wealth is a market-position metric.
1/3-1/2 of Wealth is directly inherited. An impatient Google says "37.8%"?
Then you have the fact that nearly all of the fundamental profitable market positions are owned, and securely 'moated'(save from some wealthy rival's coup, or an unlikely disaster or revolution). Then you've got nepotism, and even basic networking and barriers to entry.
'IQ' on the other hand is a 'talent'. IQ is more like 'creativity', 'attractiveness', 'athleticism', etc.. than it is like 'Wealth'.
We are talking two distinctly different type of things, under a false narrative/ common fallacy.
