>>11793652Made up quotes is not an argument, it's literally a straw-man.
EU is not science because they don't even pretend to follow any kind of scientific process. When they make up a new idea, they make a new youtube video declaring how this is clearly the case. At no point do they try to formalise this idea into any kind of quantitative framework, so that it could actually be tested. They fire out huge numbers of claims which are totally and completely untested. They claim this is the new astronomy, but they never try to test their ideas against the mountains of archival data that exist. They cite press-releases written by journalists, because they're too retarded to read the actual paper and see what the data actually said.
"The theory" doesn't exist. Nowhere is there an actual agreed upon model or set of claims, so it's untestable to anyone on the outside. There is no mathematical model of anything in the EU, so there are no real quantitative predictions that can be compared to precise measurements.
Here's a real quote that I like. From Anthony Peratt, who EUers are very fond of:
"The Plasma Universe and Plasma Cosmology have no ties to the anti-science blogsites of the holoscience 'electric universe'."
I will cite my quote, because I'm not a lying hack.
https://plasmauniverse.info/He's pretty fringe, but even he understands that the EU is not science, far from it.
