>>11784446L2, on the other hand, is on the opposite side of Earth from the Sun, about 1.5 million kilometers distance from us. Any spacecraft launched to that point would orbit more slowly than the Earth. The increased gravitational attraction of the Earth adds to that of the Sun, allowing the JWST, for instance, to go faster and to keep up, with an orbital period equal to Earth’s. It too is unstable, however.
The James Webb Space Telescope could be a valuable tool for Electric Universe advocates. One of the theoretical considerations being discussed in those circles is the habitat around brown dwarf stars. It has been proposed that brown dwarfs could be one of the most numerous stellar categories, but they cannot be adequately studied with current technologies. Even the Spitzer Space Telescope, whose onboard tank of liquid helium coolant has been exhausted, was able to capture only a few images. One tantalizing specimen was estimated to be a mere 27 C, prompting the need for a more detailed and long-term analysis of that population.
As Wal Thornhill wrote: “All stars are an electrical phenomenon. There are no ‘misfits’ in an Electric Universe. All of the assumptions being heaped upon the meagre photons received from deep space merely serve, as usual, to force fit the data to the standard model of stars. The very name, brown ‘dwarf’, assumes that these stars are ‘compact balls of gas floating freely in space’. In stark comparison, the electric model describes them as ‘huge’ because the light from a star is a plasma discharge phenomenon with only a loose relationship to the physical size of the star and a strong dependence on the electrical environment.”
