>>11782734The Polar Configuration.
>>11783673Spot on.
>>11783741Not him, but it's extremely naive to believe the solar system has always been the way it is now.
I'm well aware of the Polar Configuration though, so I'll answer your post.
Saturn, Mars and Venus were many times larger in the sky than our moon appears today, especially Saturn. They were very, very, very close. So close in fact, that at times when Mars got too close there were violent electrical discharges between Mars and Earth. The Grand Canyon and Valles Marineris were carved during these events, very, very, very quickly, and very, very, very violently.
You don't understand how gravity operates. Some moons in the solar system experiences very little to almost no gravity due to the distances they are from the planets they orbit. Regardless of the mass of an object, how much gravity it experiences can be entirely altered by how close it is to other larger objects with greater gravitational pull. And this is only taking gravity into account. Bodies in space are electrically charged and influence each other through their electric fields.
>there were planets all around earth all pulling so even things on the other side get pulledCompletely wrong. That's not how the Polar Configuration was. Jupiter, Saturn, Venus and Mars, in that order, were in an axial alignment (through the poles), with Earth's north pole facing the other planets. There were no planets on the south pole side of Earth. So the rest of your comment is meaningless. The closeness of the planets have already been addressed. As for Earth's moon, it's much smaller than Earth. Jupiter and Saturn are much, much, much larger. That combined with Venus, a body almost the same size as Earth, plus Mars which is half the size as Earth. Hence gravity was much lower during the Polar Configuration.
