>>11775230How? I don't have intellect. in the super-human level (super in the words original definition).
My main clues is that nature doesn't ever need to think, yet it always does. It solves navier-stokes continuously in a time frame less than we can imagine for not only the entire ocean, but the entire universe, at every single timestep no matter how small it is.
To have a mathematical system which gets instantly implodes at something so simple as a crossroads of division, addition and exponentials makes no sense. The same reasoning goes with dividing by zero, or with the hypotenuse of aa triangle with a length of side i. It, to me, seems like excuses to keep using a system which might use a new, better design.
Historically, a lot of mathmatical knowledge has been found without using our current sytem. What's there to say we can go much further using the one we do?
