Bell claimed that the failure of semi-classical physics to predict the correlation in his experiment solved the EPR paradox in favor of quantum mechanics. Bell is wrong. Attached is a semi-classical derivation that predicts the results of that experiment exactly.

Bell and his followers error is continually making the fallacy that correlation =causation. A quote from them follows

On the assumption that the experimental settings can be treated as free variables, whose values are determined exogenously, if the choice of setting on one wing is made at spacelike separation from the experiment on the other, a dependence of the probability of the outcome of one experiment on the setting of the other would seem straightforwardly to be an instance of a nonlocal causal influence. The condition that this not occur can be formulated as follows.