>>11768420i used the absolute state of meme as a rhetoric device to express disagreement with the greentext paraphrasing, which contains the substance of my reply.
which in case it wasn't clear enough, is criticizing the way you dismiss OP as nonsense because you are unable to understand him. i took for granted that i don't need to vomit out a small essay on why and how this is bad.
i naively thought that if you have the intelligence to ask OP to define what he means by "0.000..001" then you should be aware of the fact that what you are doing is is lazy, and that you are giving yourself breaks because you think OP can't call out your bullshit.
i thought that you simply got caught up in the heat of an argument and it would be enough to remind you what you are doing, in order to make you self conscious. in my second post i expressed it in more detail. evidently i did not use enough words to warrant a serious reply, so here enjoy this unnecessary post. you made me use up more effort. am i worthy of your attention now?
