>>11765049define your points
Major points understand about his thoughts were
a.
>fields like math takes a very high IQ to be good at and as men are more likely to be outliers (both retarders and smarters) math departments are going to be mostly men. This is not oppression, making them equal would be oppression and hurt society.This is mostly right. But lets not pretend some math departments do not have hostile environments that make women switch, on this very board I have heard stories of Proffs having sexist word problems in class and everyone here laughing along.
My ex girlfriend has a phd and a guy she tutored who was terrible at stats and needed her tutoring in advanced stats 3 times a week now has a a 95k stats job right out of school and could be making much more in a few years while she is still struggling to break 50k.
So do not pretend there are not some gender biases and problems. So he was wrong there
The problem is feminists focus on retarded metrics everyone knows are wrong "why are boards not 50% female" "why dont women on the whole make as much as men [when women drop out for 5 years mid career to raise kids]" He was right there.
