>>11762108Hello i think ive been a bit naive and new..
Sg had direct links to ivan.
There's direct links in here too isnt there, to nasa and such.
Also shills to direct the flow of conversation creating the bi product of controlled information, which in event allows you to shift what is perceived as true.
Basically what im saying is, if you were in possession of information that the technology in these public flights is almost obsolete and these are staged in such a fashion to portray the motion that we are not an advanced species, like we often state aliens, gods or giants played a part in the construction of monoliths.
A space colony project to mars was created in 1950.
70 years later it is public knowledge we entend to colonise mars.
Funny how 70 years is precisely the declassification peroid
Battle los angeles - tr3b black manta.
Foo fighters - the failed avrocar shows again, human tech.
Why are we still launching rockets from the ground? To carry humans in pods to iss or launch satellites?
We have aircraft that can operate in low orbit.. the iss got a picture of them.. right so thats how you get people there.. no rocket needed.
Satellites could be constructed using the outdated debris of decommissioned and spent ones already out there, every rocket launch is just a step towards the depletion of fossil fuels, how you gonna launch them when fuel runs out..
Let me guess as if by magic some innovation of electromagnetic pulse drives, or antigravity.. or they will do what i mentioned above as if it is the first option, that is already possible now..
Mods will there be a launch?
When colonisation is sucessful. What is the statistical chance that the wealth gap will divide between planets?
Its whats in store really, its all fun and games going to space until you realise its a select few and once achieved you are expendable