>>11753616Interesting question.
If it's a simple selection between B and A+B,
it'll be A+B since it's guaranteed money despite
the Predictor's analysis.
>>11753748 had a good question on whetherthe selector is aware of the Predictor and that
the choice is B. The Predictor's analysis is
near perfect and can certainly screw the
selector out of a million if the analysis is wrong.
So, let there be TWO selectors. If the first
selects B in agreement with analysis, the
second shall pick B. If not in agreement,
the second runs and collects A ensuring that
he is not empty-handed, the Predictor's logic
bypassed, and the first selector gets 500
if the second is nice enough to do halvsies.
