>>11744603>Mass energy equivalence?I use mass to describe the phenomena, not it's description.
Both matter and pure energy are masses. Light bends around black holes because of gravitational acceleration due to light having mass. Solar sails work off this principle, retard. To think that a mass affects "space-time", therefore affecting gravity, is true schizophrenia.You being unable to think outside the math and theory you were taught is retarding you.
>Inertia is not a property of energyIs wrong and the contrary position is inherent to the fundamental assertions of the whole piece as I stated here
>>11744583.
>As opposed to an incoherent massBy consistent and coherent, I meant matter and energy of a consistent direction, location and magnitude relative in scale to one another and the mass it passes by.
>So what if no fields are presentEverything with magnitude is a field.
Everything with mass has magnitude.
All masses are fields of energy, even protons, neutrons and, yes, even a neutrino - though given the difficulty in merely observing them, its hard as fuck to test on them, regardless of what the theory being tested is.
>>11744654I'll be honest, I don't really understand about half of the diagrams he made. The creator even admits most people won't understand most of them.
>op is making a confirmation biasHow? OP didn't make the pics.
>Patterns are confirmation biasNo, they are patterns, nothing more. They are used to show the nature of what he describes instead of just writing it. "Human constructs" also include all knowledge, so I don't know what exactly where your critique is. Anti-humanism? Sounds pretty devil-worshipy to me.
>All the patterns are pointing to a mental illness.Pattern recognition is healthy human behavior.
You are doing the same thing right now by recognizing his behavior as what you have been told is mental illness.
Inb4 >I said you'd say that was hypocritical.
No, what I'm saying is worse, I'm saying that what you said was wrong.
