>>11750234Basically, yes. Of course, it's not a bad system in the sense that most of the time, it can sustain itself without starving its people for a relatively long period of time (if there is not too much communism in the package obviously). The thing I value the most is freedom and democracy isn't the system that would maximize it the most as theft by the authority is always included in this system.
>>11750377> your parents did for youSo I didn't, my parent's opinion isn't my own.
> you did when you didn't give up your citizenshipI actually moved away from my country a few years ago and it cost a whole bunch of money (the low-tax country probably won't accept you for free after all, the lawyer, and in my country the very fact of giving up the citizenship wasn't free maybe it's the same in the US I don't know), and that doesn't make my opinion invalid, but that's not the point:
1) Why I am the one who should leave when I'm just a peaceful dude that doesn't want to get his money stolen ? The government is the one holding the gun so that I pay my taxes.
2) How does my mere presence indicates my consent to the system ? "Implicitly" signing a contract is nonsensical, nobody in private life would agree to this and would call it theft (which is right).
3) The fact that I inescapably use government services (meaning paid by taxpayers) I had no choice but to use, such as roads, doesn't mean I consented. For example, if I eat a meal in prison, it doesn't mean that I consent to imprisonment, even though I used a service provided by the system.
If I say "I DON'T CONSENT", it means I don't fucking consent and my "implicit consent" has no value whatsoever over me saying that I don't consent.
Stop thinking that anyone who disagree with you is a moron or a child, it will make you a better human being.
