>>11733123Krauss grabs boobies (at least that is the consensus, i don't know if he admitted it if there was proof) and the physics community got him fired and banished and his life is basically in shambles. for grabbing a boob. whereas the president grabs women by the pussy, admits it on camera, and gets elected afterword nonetheless.
having pictures with epstein or going on a trip to epstein's island.... a bunch of people are guilty of that. as i said, even Lisa Randall, the unmarried woman with no kids and no significant other as far as anyone knows. or Stephen Pinker, who "leftists" hate. i'm sure the list is in the thousands. honestly, if a billionaire said "i'll fly you down on my private jet to my private island and give you a free vacation with other academics" (maybe you are not an academic, but fill in "other _____" with whatever you fancy yourself to be) would you say no?
he also donated money to lots of non-string theory physicists. Seth Lloyd, the "quantum mechanic" at MIT, had to issue an apology for accepting grant money from Epstein. I'm not aware of any string theorists who got funding directly from Epstein -- in fact, i have heard that Epstein directly funded Lee Smolin, a critic of string theory.
you can make of the facts what you want (maybe Epstein actually was funding Smolin because he hated string theory? Lubos Motl says that). but in reality the dude had billions of dollars and threw lavish parties for lots of people. if you were just some random person who got an invite to take a free awesome trip to a private caribbean island, why would you turn it down? so he managed to get lots of people to do that to drink wine and eat fancy meals and go swimming. assuming there was a secret adrenochrome element to it is ridiculous and boomer QAnon-level magical thinking. and if you are a boomer QAnon-er, please stop reading the internet, you're too old, go back to AM radio where you came from