>>11719586There probably are some unpublished theses and papers on obscure in house university journals that are not easily available. Or in the homework of some guy at uni.
But peer reviewed well made studies that can hit the more prolific sci journals? Not likely. Why? because
>>11721192, it would be detrimental to know because you would kill entire industries because of it. At first glance we can see that technology at a very early age can be detrimental, look at the current generation of middle schoolers. Those faggot kids can't even kick a ball or climb a fucking tree like normal kids.
