/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11708598

615KiB, 800x800, math_problem3.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Mon 25 May 01:27:12 2020 No.11708598 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11708747 >>11710226 >>11712569

You should be able to solve this.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 May 2020 02:12:09 No.11708747 Report

Quoted By: >>11708773

>>11708598
50/50 it either happens or it doesn’t.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 May 2020 02:21:06 No.11708773 Report

Quoted By:

>>11708747
The ultimate answer to everything

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 May 2020 15:11:48 No.11710210 Report

Quoted By: >>11710271 >>11712558 >>11712853

Any prime that divides n, by fermats little theorem

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 May 2020 15:21:05 No.11710226 Report

Quoted By: >>11714032

>>11708598
This seems like one of those faggot problems that have been unsolved since archimedes was fucking goats in caves

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 May 2020 15:54:03 No.11710271 Report

Quoted By: >>11710277

>>11710210
What if n = p?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 May 2020 15:57:02 No.11710277 Report

Quoted By: >>11710280

>>11710271
What if n = p = q = x?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 May 2020 15:58:17 No.11710280 Report

Quoted By: >>11710284

>>11710277
Yeah that's what I just asked.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 May 2020 16:00:11 No.11710284 Report

Quoted By:

>>11710280
No you asked if n = pQUEDTIONAMRLLJK

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 May 2020 21:04:35 No.11711243 Report

Quoted By:

"Prove that.."
I'm outta here

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 May 2020 05:33:13 No.11712558 Report

Quoted By: >>11712566

>>11710210
doesn't the same q have to work for all n though? you can't pick a prime that divides n as your q when n is all integers.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 May 2020 05:36:22 No.11712566 Report

Quoted By:

>>11712558
Yeah I read the question wrong. I'm now suspecting that the statement is false

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 May 2020 05:37:22 No.11712569 Report

Quoted By: >>11712803 >>11714638

>>11708598
see: Carmichael numbers
Q.E.D.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 May 2020 07:46:45 No.11712803 Report

Quoted By:

>>11712569
based 69

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 May 2020 08:14:18 No.11712853 Report

Quoted By:

>>11710210
no that doesn't apply here, Fermat's little theorem would be regarding mod p, but this question is mod q

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 May 2020 16:23:12 No.11714032 Report

Quoted By:

>>11710226

Solution would probably require a complete reworking of fundamental mathematics.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 May 2020 19:07:06 No.11714638 Report

Quoted By:

>>11712569
Carmichael numbers are composite.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 May 2020 19:28:23 No.11714692 Report

Quoted By:

If such a q did not exist, then x^p-p would have rational roots - a contradiction.

Look up Hasse's principle.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches