>>11707774It would be amazing if they were NOT right about it. That's because biology predicts differences according to evolution, and "races" really just represent relatively isolated populations in different environments.
For example, why are people in south India on average shorter than people in Russia or Europe?
Why do Chinese people tend to have dark hair?
Why do Africans tend to have dark skin the further south you go?
These are all different populations which evolved apart from one another over thousands of years, in different environments.
So it only makes sense that IQ tests would score these populations differently.
The most obvious example of this fact, to me, is how California bans IQ tests of its black students, and how testing scores are being dropped for university admissions for similar reasons. Circumstantially, observe how black Americans speak and write the English language. They as a group have trouble with it, which points to IQ.
These are all "tells" which formal studies would tend to clarify.
>>11707778It's only shit to people who don't like the implications.
>>11707834Not a good explanation, because these kinds of scores and tests span across all sorts of different environments and there is always a stunning difference in IQ between different "racial" populations.
>>11707839It doesn't have to be excessively complicated. If you take it at face value, then a lot of the problems in society make a lot more sense. You can add complexity at that point, but it really comes down to how you want to deal with it, rather than truth.
>>11708012Genetically? How can you say that with a straight face? Look at how different the various populations of humans are from each other, yet we should believe that their brains are identical?
>>11708035pol likes to buck against the mainstream, for its own sake. It isn't rational, just rebellious.
>>11708435Machiavellian but true.
