>>11705485It's hard to tell where Archimedes would have been in modern times. Euler, Newton, and Gauss certainly had some highly informative work, and the demigod tier is well chosen as well. I wouldn't place Schrodinger or Planck on the same level as Hilbert, Godel, Cauchy, or Einstein. Maxwell and Fourier seem to be heavily underrated. Feynman is a touch above his realm. Wiles, Perelman, and Tao are ridiculously underrated.
The only person who could be classified correctly as anything "subpar tier" or below is Stephen J. Gould, who lied about data. I would place Hawking at mid-tier for his serious research.
