>>11702091As math movies go it's unironically good. Actual mathematics is discussed and explained (or touched upon), as feasibly as is possible in a mid-budget mainstream film (which is: not much but just enough to start a conversation with someone who wants to learn). I'm unable to think of another "pop-math" film which gives anything approaching substantive mathematics, excepting maybe that Donald Duck mathemagic land or something. The importance of proof is stressed in the film's narrative (or else you end up with a false result, which is also depicted in the film), something something gamma function, Irons-as-Hardy lays out the basic premise of partitions on a piece of paper, and a few other ideas are explored. This really is as good as any mainstream film can ever reasonably be expected to do with handling mathematical ideas.