>>11699282I'm a mutt and have thought about this quite a bit recently. It seems to me that whites are extremely susceptible, and almost demand, vertical organization. This is why they always end up within layered or stratified, specialized, highly organized societies. They are hardwired to assume that so long as they're doing their little job, in their little box, on their own layer, they need not worry about anything else. As soon as the criteria for them to enter this state of deferred responsibility and complacency is met, and it's "good enough", they dig in and are very difficult to bring out of this rest state. They like to be a cog in the machine. When they get to be numerous enough to be urbanites, this "job" mentality, and deference, reaches a peak/ They will call the police for those who's job it is in society to do morality stuff, to come and take care of anything for them. They lazily submit to the rule of law no matter how perverse, out of fear or believing it for the greater good. At their core, counterintuitively, whites readily take up a thinly veiled authoritarian collectivist functionality. And it's a function of density, all you have to do is pack them together and organize them within a supporting structure, and give them food, and they submit. We can see however with the other races, this doesn't work. They become more violent with population density, whereas whites become net less.
This is why more lateral organizers (Native Americans, Jews, probably some northern Africans, etc) who are sufficiently inclined and smart enough resort to divide and conquer, pit them against each other, and so forth to remove the king, aristocracy, or whatever it may be. This trait makes them easy to hijack. They lack resilience and individual units have poor foresight and detection of subversive infiltrators. It cannot be denied how easily whites are propagandized and put to sleep, so long as a source has an official sounding name.
