>>11695631Ever heard of "confirmation bias"? You are just arbitrarily catagorizing things in order to fit your binary narrative. Let's take a few examples of where you are bullshitting
>civilisation vs natureIn what way is this a binary? Arguably civilisation could be seen as a byproduct of nature, not it's opposite. After all, humans are part of nature and we created it, and then in typical human arbitrary fashion decided to see them as seperate concepts.
>man vs womanNot a complete binary. There are a ton of intersex disorders so sex is not strictly binary although in humans I suppose it mainly is. Other species have a whole range of different types of sex though that certainly are not binary.
>light vs darkDark is just the absense of light. You could create this binary with anything. Donut vs no donut, cupboard vs no cupboard. Just because we have given a name to the absense of light does not make it a binary. Light is a spectrum of different energy wavelengths, not a binary.
>us vs themCompletely, utterly arbitrary.
>spirituality vs materialismYet again, this is not always a binary. Some people have a mix between these beliefs. I would consider myself a pantheist which is somewhere between spiritualism and atheism. Spirituality is incredibly complex and NOT a binary.
>day vs nightThe day vs night cycle is a continuous process. Yet again, it is humans who arbitrarily gave names to the time when the sun is in the sky vs when the sun is below the horizon.
>right vs leftHuman concept, yet again. Nature has no "right" or "left", they are just useful for understanding how to navigate our 3D world.
>thesis vs antithesisHuman concepts, not baked into nature itself.
>life vs deathArbitrary distinction. Life is just a series of chemical, electrical and kinetic forces that drive themselves to reproduce and stay in that form. If you looked at it from a different perspective, you could argue there is no real difference between living things and dead
